Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Iranian journal of public health ; 51(12):2664-2673, 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2233410

ABSTRACT

Background: Climate change based on temperature, humidity and wind can improve many characteristics of the arthropod carrier life cycle, including survival, arthropod population, pathogen communication, and the spread of infectious agents from vectors. This study aimed to find association between content of disease followed climate change we demonstrate in humans. Methods: All the articles from 2016 to 2021 associated with global climate change and the effect of vector-borne disease were selected form databases including PubMed and the Global Biodiversity information facility database. All the articles selected for this short review were English. Results: Due to the high burden of infectious diseases and the growing evidence of the possible effects of climate change on the incidence of these diseases, these climate changes can potentially be involved with the COVID-19 epidemic. We highlighted the evidence of vector-borne diseases and the possible effects of climate change on these communicable diseases. Conclusion: Climate change, specifically in rising temperature system is one of the world's greatest concerns already affected pathogen-vector and host relation. Lice parasitic, fleas, mites, ticks, and mosquitos are the prime public health importance in the transmission of virus to human hosts.

2.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 12: 983089, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2198707

ABSTRACT

The gut microbiota undergoes significant alterations in response to viral infections, particularly the novel SARS-CoV-2. As impaired gut microbiota can trigger numerous neurological disorders, we suggest that the long-term neurological symptoms of COVID-19 may be related to intestinal microbiota disorders in these patients. Thus, we have gathered available information on how the virus can affect the microbiota of gastrointestinal systems, both in the acute and the recovery phase of the disease, and described several mechanisms through which this gut dysbiosis can lead to long-term neurological disorders, such as Guillain-Barre syndrome, chronic fatigue, psychiatric disorders such as depression and anxiety, and even neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease. These mechanisms may be mediated by inflammatory cytokines, as well as certain chemicals such as gastrointestinal hormones (e.g., CCK), neurotransmitters (e.g., 5-HT), etc. (e.g., short-chain fatty acids), and the autonomic nervous system. In addition to the direct influences of the virus, repurposed medications used for COVID-19 patients can also play a role in gut dysbiosis. In conclusion, although there are many dark spots in our current knowledge of the mechanism of COVID-19-related gut-brain axis disturbance, based on available evidence, we can hypothesize that these two phenomena are more than just a coincidence and highly recommend large-scale epidemiologic studies in the future.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neurodegenerative Diseases , Humans , COVID-19/complications , Brain-Gut Axis , Dysbiosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Brain
3.
Tumori ; 108(5): 407-419, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1582701

ABSTRACT

People at high risk of morbidity and mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), including patients dealing with malignancies and patients on immunosuppressive anticancer therapies, need to be followed carefully as the pandemic continues. Challenges in continuing cancer management and patient monitoring are of concern given the importance of timing in cancer therapy. Alternative treatment decisions and priorities are also important considerations. The efficacy and safety of various cancer treatments in patients with COVID-19 are other important considerations. In this systematic review, we summarize the potential risks and benefits of cancer treatments applied to patients with COVID-19 and malignant tumors. Using the PubMed and Scopus databases, we reviewed studies involving cancer therapy and COVID-19 to address the recent discoveries and related challenges of cancer therapy in patients with COVID-19 and cancer.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasms , Humans , Immunotherapy , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Iran J Immunol ; 18(1): 34-46, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1159472

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is a new global health threat. OBJECTIVES: to analyze the effectiveness of the measurement of specific antibodies to SARS-CoV2 (IgM and IgG) for the diagnosis of COVID-19 and to analyze the rate of SARS-CoV2 seroprevalence in the population. METHODS: 11 relevant studies, published before June 5, 2020, were included in this meta-analysis. These studies were identified by searching the MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The final selected studies were analyzed using STATA version 14. Publication bias was examined using both Egger's test and Funnel plots. Moreover, the I² statistic has been used to evaluate and verify heterogeneity. RESULTS: The 11 relevant studies selected for the present meta-analysis cover a total of 996 infection cases. According to the results, the average rate of positive cases for IgM (AU/mL) was 2.10 (95% CI: 1.65-2.55; I2=92.2%), and the sensitivity in individuals with positive IgM test was 63% (95% CI: 47-79; I2=94.9%). In addition, the average rate of positive cases for IgG (AU/mL) was 67.44 (95% CI: 28.79-106.09; I2=99.4%), and the sensitivity in individuals with positive IgG test was 79% (95% CI: 67-90; I2=89.5%). CONCLUSIONS: According to this analysis, detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies may assist early detection of SARS-CoV2 infection. Whether antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 confer protective immunity warrants further studies.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19 Serological Testing , COVID-19/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Biomarkers/blood , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/immunology , Early Diagnosis , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Seroepidemiologic Studies
5.
PLoS One ; 16(2): e0246190, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1085154

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: With the increase in the number of COVID-19 infections, the global health apparatus is facing insufficient resources. The main objective of the current study is to provide additional data regarding the clinical characteristics of the patients diagnosed with COVID-19, and in particular to analyze the factors associated with disease severity, lack of improvement, and mortality. METHODS: 102 studies were included in the present meta-analysis, all of which were published before September 24, 2020. The studies were found by searching a number of databases, including Scopus, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase. We performed a thorough search from early February until September 24. The selected papers were evaluated and analyzed using Stata software application version 14. RESULTS: Ultimately, 102 papers were selected for this meta- analysis, covering 121,437 infected patients. The mean age of the patients was 58.42 years. The results indicate a prevalence of 79.26% for fever (95% CI: 74.98-83.26; I2 = 97.35%), 60.70% for cough (95% CI: 56.91-64.43; I2 = 94.98%), 33.21% for fatigue or myalgia (95% CI: 28.86-37.70; I2 = 96.12%), 31.30% for dyspnea (95% CI: 26.14-36.69; I2 = 97.67%), and 10.65% for diarrhea (95% CI: 8.26-13.27; I2 = 94.20%). The prevalence for the most common comorbidities was 28.30% for hypertension (95% CI: 23.66-33.18; I2 = 99.58%), 14.29% for diabetes (95% CI: 11.88-16.87; I2 = 99.10%), 12.30% for cardiovascular diseases (95% CI: 9.59-15.27; I2 = 99.33%), and 5.19% for chronic kidney disease (95% CI: 3.95-6.58; I2 = 96.42%). CONCLUSIONS: We evaluated the prevalence of some of the most important comorbidities in COVID-19 patients, indicating that some underlying disorders, including hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and chronic kidney disease, can be considered as risk factors for patients with COVID-19 infection. Furthermore, the results show that an elderly male with underlying diseases is more likely to have severe COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cough/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Fever/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/mortality , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality/trends
6.
Future Microbiol ; 15: 1747-1758, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1011368

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2, is an international concern. This infection requires urgent efforts to develop new antiviral compounds. To date, no specific drug in controlling this disease has been identified. Developing the new treatment is usually time consuming, therefore using the repurposing broad-spectrum antiviral drugs could be an effective strategy to respond immediately. In this review, a number of broad-spectrum antivirals with potential efficacy to inhibit the virus replication via targeting the virus spike protein (S protein), RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), 3-chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLpro) and papain-like protease (PLpro) that are critical in the pathogenesis and life cycle of coronavirus, have been evaluated as possible treatment options against SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , Virus Replication/drug effects , Chymases/drug effects , Coronavirus Papain-Like Proteases/drug effects , Coronavirus RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase/drug effects , Drug Repositioning , Humans , Virus Internalization/drug effects
7.
Rev Cardiovasc Med ; 21(3): 433-442, 2020 09 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-875133

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a novel coronavirus infection that has rapidly spread worldwide, causing a pandemic. The main objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the prevalence of the most common symptoms and complications of COVID-19. All relevant studies on the clinical complications of COVID-19 have been identified by searching two web databases (i.e., PubMed and Scopus). Afterward, the relevant data were extracted from the selected studies, and then analyzed by the STATA (Version 14) random-effects model. The 30 studies selected for our meta-analysis covered 6,389 infected patients. The prevalence rates of the most common symptoms were as follows: fever: 84.30% (95% CI: 77.13-90.37; I2 = 97.74%), cough: 63.01% (95% CI: 57.63-68.23; I2 = 93.73%), dyspnea: 37.16% (95% CI: 27.31-47.57%; I2 = 98.32%), fatigue: 34.22% (95% CI: 26.29-42.62; I2 = 97.29%), and diarrhea: 11.47% (95% CI: 6.96-16.87; I2 = 95.58%). Moreover, the most prevalent complications were found to be acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with 33.15% (95% CI: 23.35-43.73; I2 = 98.56%), arrhythmia with 16.64% (95% CI: 9.34-25.5; I2 = 92.29%), acute cardiac injury with 15.68% (95% CI: 11.1-20.97; I2 = 92.45%), heart failure with 11.50% (95% CI: 3.45-22.83; I2 = 89.48%), and acute kidney injury (AKI) with 9.87% (95% CI: 6.18-14.25; I2 = 95.64%). In this study, we assessed the prevalence of the main clinical complications of COVID-19, and found that following respiratory complications, cardiac and renal complications are the most common clinical complications of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Global Health , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Prevalence , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL